Wednesday, 20 June 2012



Pinky remembered-
By- Shafiq Solangi

The Sun of June 21, 1953 witnessed the birth of a great leader of the world Shaheed Mohtrama Benazir Bhutto. Her father Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto called her Pinky. He knew that his daughter has great potential to be a great leader that’s why he always kept her under his own guidance. 

When she arrived home after her father’s martyrdom she was welcomed by millions of peoples in Lahore. People always supported her as they did to her father Mr. Bhutto. She joined politics to fulfill her father’s mission and to bring Democracy, modernization and development in Pakistan. When this brave girl of gutsy father came back the people showed great love and affection to her and elected her as the first woman Prime Minister of Pakistan and first ever in entire Muslim world. She became a sign of democracy, bravery and a pride of all civilized democracies, and women of the world.

Unfortunately the forces of tyranny interfered in her first term of government and she could not complete her tenure same happened with her during her second tenure and the oppression and authoritarian prevailed over good and democracy. But people of Pakistan never stopped supporting and loving her and soon she became the most popular and loving leader of the nation like Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.

She was supported by whole nation, a hope had been candled in hearts of people that she has arrived and everything will be alright, that’s why people called her chain of federation and champion of democracy. Those who were opponent of democracy and welfare of people found it a threat to their interests.

On 27 December 2007 brave Pinky was martyred, her killers thought that her vision, and her ideas would also die with her but perhaps they had never known that she has left her vision and ideas in the minds and hearts of the nation which can’t be erased. Her name will remain living until the last supporter of democracy is alive on this earth.

Happy Birthday BB.

Tuesday, 19 June 2012




The new political frontier
Pakistan Today: Friday, May 25, 2012 
Ignore the influence of social media at your own peril

Gone are the days when we used to wait for the morning paper to know about national and international affairs - because of social media, we get the information as it happens. In today’s interconnected world, text messages, emails, Facebook, Twitter, blogs and other social media tools have replaced traditional media like radio, print and television.
The internet has been perhaps the most outstanding innovation in the field of communications and research. Today, a big chunk of the world population uses the internet for multiple purposes. Internet World Stats (IWS) estimated that there are around 2,267,233,742 internet users in the world which is 32.7% of the total world population. A regional breakup suggests that 44.8% of total internet users are Asians. Interestingly, among the world’s top 20 internet user states, China stands at number one, India at number three and Pakistan at twenty.
According to the study, in December 2011, there were about 30 million internet users in Pakistan which amounts to 15.5 percent of the total population. Facebook is the most visited Internet site in Pakistan, followed by Google, YouTube, Wikipedia, Twitter, LinkedIn and others. Pakistan is at 26th in the world ranking of Facebook users; currently, there are more than 6 million Facebook users in Pakistan. 51 per cent of the 6 million Facebook users from Pakistan belong to the 18-24 age bracket. Twitter is said to have around more than 3 million users in Pakistan (more than the population of our capital city, Islamabad) and this rate is increasing rapidly. Thus, a Twitter post of 140 characters is powerful beyond its size.
Internet penetration is dramatically increasing in our country as Pakistan Telecommunication Ltd (PTCL) and other telecommunications are now offering affordable and speedy internet services now. Our involvement and interest in social networking can be judged when the government, particularly the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) was vastly criticised by people from every walk of life when it blocked Twitter for more than eight hours on May 20. Next day, it was a front page story on mainstream papers with editorials and opinions.
This new media is effective in many ways. It provides a platform to the people where they can write, share and express their ideas without any fear and compulsion and gives them an opportunity to get together and united for a purpose. It also gives people the sense of being empowered since they can raise social issues, agitate about them, forward their opinions to the requisite authorities through these channels. Since it is an excellent source of connectivity, not only is it a catalyst for collective social action but also makes organising the same easier. Thus, social media channels can have an effect on public opinion and influence policy making in a number of ways.
It is well know that almost all American politicians employ social media to full effect in their elections campaign. Nicolas Sarkozy and François Hollande too used social media very effectively in the French presidential elections held in April-May this year. Not so surprisingly, social media played an important role in helping Hollande to win the presidential elections.
Today, political parties in Pakistan are also making good use of social media; most of the political parties have official websites, Facebook and Twitter pages. This shows that they have now recognised the power and significance of these new media. Social networks are the best medium for our political parties to attract and engage their followers and voters, especially their younger, urban demographic. Most political parties such as the PPP, PTI, PML-N, MQM manage their online presence to communicate with their workers and engage and inform people about their events and policies.
Politicians too have their individual accounts. Imran Khan, Marvi Memon, Bilawal Bhutto, Shahbaz Sharif, Pervez Musharraf and others have a sizable fan following on social forums. This shows their interest to defend their party and engage with people via social media. However; Imran Khan and his PTI is using social media more effectively and strategically than others. Diplomats are not behind in this race; they are actively engaged with their followers on social media forums. Pakistan ambassador to US Sherry Rehman, former ambassador Hussain Haqqani are but two examples of diplomats active on Twitter.
It won’t be a stretch to claim that these forums are playing an effective and constructive role in our society and in the politics of the country. According to reports, 50 per cent of the registered voters are between eighteen to thirty five years of age; political parties cannot ignore the fact that this segment of population uses the internet and social networks the most. The one who will attract and engage the followers on social forums will definitely reap the benefits in the near future.
Social media is challenging traditional political patterns and it is introducing new political paradigms. Our political parties have to own and adopt these new practices because the influence of online social networks will definitely make a difference in future elections, and those who will ignore this will do so at their own peril.
The writer is a political research analyst based in Islamabad and tweets @shafiqsolangi

Sindh — In a state of negligence By Shafiq Solangi


Published in Daily Times: Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Flooded towns, broken roads, politicised police, extortion, worst law and order, robberies, mobile snatching, unavailability of clean drinking water, no proper drainage system - welcome to Sindh. The second most populated province of the country with rich natural resources, culture and history is unfortunately facing terrible negligence of the government.

It is really very awful to know that the flood-hit areas of the province like Badin, Mirpurkhas, Tharparkar and other districts are still flooded. Indeed, floodwater from the land of influenced people has been cleared but the land and houses of less influenced are still under water. Broken roads, displaced families, destroyed villages and towns themselves tell the state of negligence by the government. International aid agencies also question Sindh government’s credibility of aid distribution and doubt that a chunk of aid goes into the pockets of the government officials. The Sindh government should pay serious attention and take firm steps for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of flood-hit areas and internally displaced families.

The law and order situation of the province is getting onto a horrifying track. We see, read and listen about increasing rate of robberies, kidnapping, ethnic and societal violence. Trend of extortion is also increasing which indeed is an alarming sign for the local business community. Police and other law enforcement agencies should stop behaving like an ostrich and work actively with open eyes to maintain peace and order in the province. They, however, are equally responsible for growing bloodshed.

Growing violence and use of force by the influential and feudal lords increases the sense of deprivation and insecurity in local middle class, especially in minorities. Hindu business community has a great contribution in the economy of Sindh but now unfortunately the Hindu families are leaving for India as they have serious security concerns here. Their children are abducted regularly for ransom; their girls are forcibly converted to Islam at gunpoint and their men receive death threats for extortion. This educated, professional and peaceful community needs government’s and right groups’ attention at the earliest.

Situation of education in Sindh is also not satisfactory; hundreds of schools have no physical infrastructure and faculty. Many schools are run by a single or coupe of teachers, while others enjoy the salaries in agreement with higher education or administrative authorities. Cheating culture in our education institutes is also worrisome; it is very shameful to see our public education system is deteriorating so badly. Since education after 18th Amendment became a provincial subject, and we cannot and should not blame the federal government of all the mess in it.

Former capital of Sindh, Hyderabad, is rapidly transforming into a metropolitan city. This should be the reason of wariness for the city management; however, no long-term policies have been introduced to govern this city properly and peacefully. People who live in Islamabad and Karachi would get surprised to know that there is only one functional traffic signal in this huge city, and perhaps that too is practical because nearby is the Hyderabad Saddar Cantt. Condition of roads is most horrible, broken roads full of sewerage water and squeezed traffic are even worst. No renovation projects have been witnessed by the people since very long.

Intentionally or unintentionally people are unheard at the higher level while the province has been ignored terribly. People complain against this neglect of the government because the expectations from their favourite government were unduly high. Perhaps, those who were elected to serve their people haven’t stopped over in cities or possibly they have no more interest to solve the problems of the people of their constituencies. 

Honestly speaking, the dilemma with the Pakistani politicians is that they forget their constituencies once they get elected, they actually get busy in power politics and number games but unluckily they have to go back to their constituencies in 2013.

The writer is a political research analyst in a research-based organisation in Islamabad


Benazir Bhutto: martyr of democracy

By: Shafiq Solangi

Daily Times: Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Today (December 27, 2011) is the fourth martyrdom anniversary of Benazir Bhutto, which is being observed with a renewed pledge to make the country a true democratic, progressive and prosperous state in line with her vision. Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto will be remembered forever as a sign of democracy, bravery and a pride of all civilised democracies and women of the world. People always supported her as they did her father Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. She joined politics to fulfil her father’s mission and to bring democracy, modernisation and development to Pakistan.



When this brave girl of a gutsy father came back in 1986, the people showed great love and affection to her and elected her as the first woman prime minister of Pakistan and the first ever in the entire Muslim world. A charismatic and peerless leader as she was, Benazir Bhutto had the honour to serve the nation as the only female prime minister of the country twice (1988-1990 and 1993-1996). Benazir Bhutto always loved Pakistan and its people, which is why she came back to the country despite threats to her life.

Benazir Bhutto in an interview had said that she was willing to take the risk and pay with her life if that was the cost of restoring democracy in Pakistan. Unfortunately, the forces of tyranny interfered in her first term of government and she could not complete her tenure; the same happened with her during her second tenure. Oppression and authoritarianism prevailed over democracy. The people of Pakistan never stopped supporting and loving her.

She was supported by the whole nation; a hope had been kindled in the hearts of the people that she has arrived and everything will be all right, which is why people called her the chain of the federation and a champion of democracy. When she returned home, the opponents of democracy, peace and welfare of the people found it a threat to their interests. On December 27, 2007, brave Pinky was martyred!

Her killers thought that her vision and her ideas would also die with her but perhaps they had never known that she has left her vision and ideas in the minds and hearts of the nation, which cannot be erased. 

She sacrificed her life for the cause of democracy and followed the footsteps of her father Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. The world condemned in the strongest terms the outrageous and brutal murder of the former prime minister of Pakistan and leader of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), Ms Benazir Bhutto. Her death was not just a loss for Pakistan but for the world — the vacuum created by the assassination of Benazir Bhutto is impossible to be filled. The political arena of Pakistan will miss Shaheed BB forever. Her sacrifices continue to live on in the hearts and minds of her countrymen and her name will remain alive until the last supporter of democracy breathes in the world.









                                         

A questionable poll

By: Shafiq Solangi

The Nation: June 26, 2011
The Pew Research Center for people and press is an American research organization; Andrew Kohut is the current President of this organization. Few days back this center released a survey report that revealed that “Pakistan continues with conditions in their country, roughly nine-in-ten (92%) are dissatisfied with the country’s direction”. This survey was conducted in April and during May 8 to 15, exactly after six days of Abbottabad operation by US forces in which Osama Bin laden was killed. During these days most of the people were annoyed from the security forces and the government because of US operation and Osama’s presence in Pakistan. So it was obvious that the poll would get ‘No” to a question like, “Are you satisfied with present conditions?” 

Poll questionnaire was also based on “two exceptions” yes or no. Had Pew Research Center conducted such survey in US soon after 9/11, it would have got even worst result than this. 100% of US population would have shown dissatisfaction against their government. Meanwhile, only 1251 and 1,970 Pakistanis participated in this poll, which is very small ratio of the total population. In fact it is small enough to generalize such an important poll and reflect the feeling of the entire Pakistani public. Such poll research results do not truly reflect the thinking of the public. Pakistan is a country with 180 million of population; PRC should have not involved such a small number of people as it is responsible research organization. 
Secondly, people of the Pakistan are facing various problems, and there are different conditions in different provinces like Khyber Pakhtookhwa and Balochistan where people are facing menace of terrorism and poverty. Whereas a large number of the population in Sindh and Punjab still reeling from the affects of the floods of last year. Definitely, one cannot expect satisfaction and peace of mind from those who are being attacked by drones and suicide bombings each day. PRC should have realized that we are fighting war against extremism as a frontline state.

PRC has also revealed that popularity graph of President Asif Ali Zardari was decreased to 11% which was 20% last year. People cannot show dissatisfaction to a person who has delivered his power to the parliament, who has empowered a common person with constitutional reforms. The way PRC’s poll has been addressed and propagated is questionable and it does not seem to be transparent pool. PRC might have selected a portion or a segment of population which may not necessarily be the true representative of our society. In such surveys the questionnaire are framed in way to achieve desired results. The methodology and the results of this poll can be challenged. 



‘Revisiting Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’
By: Shafiq Solangi
Pakistan Tribune: Friday, 31st March, 2011
The PPP has decided to file a reference in the Supreme Court (SC) to revisit the Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (ZAB) verdict, which indeed is a good step to uncover the facts behind the ZAB murder. When the SC handed down the death sentence to ZAB, a former prime minster, for the assassination of Nawab Muhammad Khan, the whole world was shocked. The PPP and followers of the Bhuttos and their legacy still term his death a “judicial murder” and a propaganda orchestrated by the west and some local elements against the Bhuttos and PPP.

The PPP came into power twice after the death of the legend. Benazir Bhutto became prime minister twice but could not uncover the reality behind the assassination of her father. This is the third time the PPP is in power and now people expect the PPP government to uncover the truth behind the murder of their beloved leaders, ZAB and Benazir Bhutto. 

The Chief Justice (CJ) of Pakistan has also declared that the judiciary is free and independent, that it has not targeted any person, organization or institution. Such statements from the CJ of Pakistan are a positive sign but the judiciary has to prove its claim. The judiciary has to decide neutrally if such a reference is submitted by the president.

The opposition should stop criticizing the federal government by saying that it is trying to divert and manipulate public opinion from the real issues. In actuality, this is the real issue. ZAB is the first head of a government in Pakistan’s history who was given the death sentence and we want to know the reality behind this incident. It is now the responsibility of the judiciary to prove that it is not an anti-democratic, anti-government establishment but a free, independent, neutral law and justice body.



Silence means new blood

By- Shafiq Solangi

Daily Times: Sunday, 20th March, 2011

The Citizens for Democracy has written an open letter to the state authorities, including the president, prime minister, chief justice, heads of the political parties and others. This letter is a call for the respect of the rule of law, rights of minorities, inter-religious harmony and protection of threatened parliamentarian Sherry Rehman.

This indeed is a great initiative by the Citizens for Democracy and we all should support this step. The growing religious extremism and intolerance seems out of control but it is not too late to condemn and counter it. The state authorities should not let the assassins of Salmaan Taseer and Shahbaz Bhatti walk away unpunished and this is what morality, ethics and rule of law suggest.
Not punishing them means we are ready for another brutal act from these extremists. 

Pakistan cannot afford such incidents anymore; we shall raise our voices against evil. Let us prove that we are non-violent and a peace loving nation. Let us once unite and stand for religious harmony, tolerance, rule of law and for the protection of those who are our true national wealth. Break the silence and say no to new blood.





Let us shun intolerance

Shafiq Solangi

The Nation | March 19, 2011

We the desperate citizens of democracy are writing this open letter to the state authorities, including President, Prime Minister, Chief Justice, heads of the political parties and others. 

This letter is a call for the respect of the rule of law, rights of minorities, inter-religious harmony and protection of threatened parliamentarian and especially to the journalist community that gives voice to the suppressed and downtrodden. Let us prove that we shun violent and are a peace loving nation. 

Let us once again unite and stand for peace and harmony, tolerance, rule of law and for the protection of those who are our true national wealth.



Sherry Rehman
By: Shafiq Solangi 
Daily times: Monday, February 28, 2011
Unfortunately, good leaders have never been respected in our society; they are criticised, morally targeted, punished and even killed. People like Quaid-e-Azam, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Benazir Bhutto and Salmaan Taseer were targeted because they were different; their intellectual level was higher than that of the people of their country.
Today, we have very few intellectual lawmakers left and Sherry Rehman is among those few. However, she too is facing death threats from extremist elements present in society because she had submitted a private bill in the National Assembly to amend the country’s controversial blasphemy laws and to prevent their misuse. Religious and political parties denounced her bill; they not only opposed this bill but also proved that Zia’s Islamisation is rooted deep in our society.
A few days ago, additional sessions judge Multan Court Nisar Hussain issued an order to register a blasphemy case against Miss Rehman for committing blasphemy on the complaint made by Faheem Gul, a resident of Multan. Now people have to decide who the real blasphemer is: a person who supports the misuse of this law or a person who condemns and wants to prevent the misuse of this law. Humanitarian organizations, liberals, civil society members and the government should support and protect our brave Sherry Rehman. 

Size of the cabinet
Published in Daily Times: Monday, February 21, 2011
Present PPP-led government has always acted according to public demand and opinion. Within three years, this government has achieved milestones such as the NFC Award, Swat Operation, Balochistan Package, 18th and 19th Amendments, etc. Instead of always demanding more from our government, we should now realize that democracy needs time to strengthen its roots and structure. Nothing can change within days. However, lots of things have changed in the short span of three years within our system. 
The recent decision to decrease the size of the cabinet is also a great achievement and a positive move forward for democratic growth and evolution. Our free media and opposition actors should at least encourage this achievement of the government. This reform will not only save national wealth but will also help in the better functioning of the ministries. Instead of propagating it as ‘old wine in a new bottle’, the media and opposition elements should have said a few words of encouragement; this would have also shown their sincerity towards the nation and love for democracy. 

SHAFIQ SOLANGI
Hyderabad



Give praise where it is due
SHAFIQ SOLANGI
The Nation | February 23, 2011

Present PPP-led government has always acted according to public demand and opinion. Within three years, this government has achieved milestones such as the NFC Award, Swat Operation, Balochistan Package, 18th and 19th Amendments, etc. Instead of always demanding more from our government, we should now realize that democracy needs time to strengthen its roots and structure. Nothing can change within days. However, lots of things have changed in the short span of three years within our system. 

The recent decision to decrease the size of the cabinet is also a great achievement and a positive move forward for democratic growth and evolution. Our free media and opposition actors should at least encourage this achievement of the government. This reform will not only save national wealth but will also help in the better functioning of the ministries. Instead of propagating it as 'old wine in a new bottle, the media and opposition elements should have said a few words of encouragement; this would have also shown their sincerity towards the nation and love for democracy.


Benazir Bhutto: martyr of democracy

By- Shafiq Solangi
Daily Times: Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Today (December 27, 2011) is the fourth martyrdom anniversary of Benazir Bhutto, which is being observed with a renewed pledge to make the country a true democratic, progressive and prosperous state in line with her vision. Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto will be remembered forever as a sign of democracy, bravery and a pride of all civilised democracies and women of the world. People always supported her as they did her father Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. She joined politics to fulfil her father’s mission and to bring democracy, modernisation and development to Pakistan. 

When this brave girl of a gutsy father came back in 1986, the people showed great love and affection to her and elected her as the first woman prime minister of Pakistan and the first ever in the entire Muslim world. A charismatic and peerless leader as she was, Benazir Bhutto had the honour to serve the nation as the only female prime minister of the country twice (1988-1990 and 1993-1996). Benazir Bhutto always loved Pakistan and its people, which is why she came back to the country despite threats to her life.

Benazir Bhutto in an interview had said that she was willing to take the risk and pay with her life if that was the cost of restoring democracy in Pakistan. Unfortunately, the forces of tyranny interfered in her first term of government and she could not complete her tenure; the same happened with her during her second tenure. Oppression and authoritarianism prevailed over democracy. The people of Pakistan never stopped supporting and loving her.

She was supported by the whole nation; a hope had been kindled in the hearts of the people that she has arrived and everything will be all right, which is why people called her the chain of the federation and a champion of democracy. When she returned home, the opponents of democracy, peace and welfare of the people found it a threat to their interests. On December 27, 2007, brave Pinky was martyred!

Her killers thought that her vision and her ideas would also die with her but perhaps they had never known that she has left her vision and ideas in the minds and hearts of the nation, which cannot be erased. 

She sacrificed her life for the cause of democracy and followed the footsteps of her father Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. The world condemned in the strongest terms the outrageous and brutal murder of the former prime minister of Pakistan and leader of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), Ms Benazir Bhutto. Her death was not just a loss for Pakistan but for the world — the vacuum created by the assassination of Benazir Bhutto is impossible to be filled. The political arena of Pakistan will miss Shaheed BB forever. Her sacrifices continue to live on in the hearts and minds of her countrymen and her name will remain alive until the last supporter of democracy breathes in the world.











                                         

Avoiding additional note on NRO
Dawn | 22nd October, 2010

The NRO is probably the most discussed topic in Pakistan. A presidential ordinance issued by Pervez Musharraf on Oct 5, 2007, it aimed at providing amnesty to all those who were allegedly involved in some political cases and were not proved guilty.

The NRO is also being used as a tool for character assassination. It is also unjust, however, to label all the NRO beneficiaries as guilty because courts are so far unable to prove such cases against them. Salman Farooqui, Agha Siraj Durrani and Senator Jahanger Badar were acquitted by the court.

Unfortunately the additional note on the NRO verdict has been ignored which was written by Justice Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan.

He writes: “Many accountability cases were politically-motivated, politically-indicted, and politically-prolonged as sword of Damocles.

“If genuine, why were they dishonestly prolonged and no verdict obtained against the accused involved? Attaining benefit from the NRO is no crime in itself, neither does it prove that the beneficiaries are all guilty, the verdict rather provides them a chance to prove their innocence via courts of law”.

Why has such an important additional note been ignored by the court and the free media. While demanding resignations, the opposition must remember that they were greater indirect beneficiaries of NRO.

SHAFIQ SOLANGI
Islamabad




`Back from the brink`
Dawn | 1st October, 2010

DEMOCRACY in Pakistan is under attack. It may be recalled that the year 2008 brought a long-lasting dictatorship to an end. With the hard struggle and sacrifices of precious lives, democracy was restored, a new democratic regime started the journey with lots of problems — such as terrorism, financial breakdown, shortage of food and energy — left behind by a dictator`s regime. But now it seems that there are some elements at home and abroad who are not really happy with a democratic Pakistan. Perhaps democracy challenges their interests. 

Along with others, the media and the judiciary are also seen critical of the new government: the media wants to create its own hegemony and the judiciary wants to maintain and sustain its legitimacy over parliament. Such rivalry will bring nothing but break up the coalition of institutions and democracy.

Now the government has to accommodate these two and accept their legitimacy, or these three shall learn their boundaries and parameters of power and responsibilities to work accordingly. If not, non-democratic elements are waiting to avail themselves of such clash of institutions and will definitely try to break up the existing democratic structure.

Removal of the government, midterm elections and portraying a negative image of the democratic representatives are not the solutions. Rather such options will further destabilise the system and society. Opposition and coalition parties will not be helpful in making a ground for nonpolitical regimes once again.
It is time people and political parties learnt some lessons from the past and protected democracy.

SHAFIQ SOLANGI
Islamabad



Are TI reports transparent?
Dawn & Let us Build Pakistan Blog, July, 4, 2010

TRANSPARENCY International is a German organisation which surveys corruption around the globe and has nine offices around the world. Its chairman Adil Geelani, while appearing on a TV programme defended the recent survey which came up with the conclusion that corruption has increased in Pakistan in 2010, said: “Absence of rule of law, accountability, merit and low salaries are the main causes of corruption.” According to the Transparency International report, police is the most corrupt institution followed by the energy department, taxation, education, judiciary, health, etc. Surprisingly, the Motorway Police has been de clared to be “the most clean department” of the government.

The report suggests that Rs223 billion have been misappropriated this year; Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa is the most corrupt province of the state while Sindh and Balochistan also fall in this category, whereas Punjab province has been deduced as decreasing the rate of corruption in the present year.

The Government of Pakistan recognised and signed an agreement with the Transparency International Secretariat in 2001, the same year Transparency International published its first report. The 2nd was published in 2006; the 3rd in 2009, and the 4th this year. There was no sign of Transparency International for the past four years and conducted only two surveys in six years.

This national corruption perception survey is conducted by IBA students (but the survey has not been certified by IBA). They used 50,200 survey samples for preparing their report. They visited four provinces. In Punjab, they surveyed Sailkot, Daska, Gugrawala, Chakwal and Lahore. In Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw, they surveyed Bher, Haripur, Manshe and Abbottabad.

Nobody is denying the fact that corruption is a major problem of this country, but the way it is addressed and propagated by Transparency International is questionable and does not seem to be so transparent. Generally it conducts surveys from small sections of society or selects a portion of people who may not necessarily be true representatives of our society. Besides, it may make such questionnaires which may serve its desired results.

Declaring one province as the most corrupt and another clean show that Transparency International itself is biased. One can easily challenge its claim and the methodology by which it brings the public corruption perception index. 

SHAFIQ SOLANGI 
Islamabad




New judiciary: credit goes to whom?
Dawn: June 5, 2010

THE executive, the legislature and the judiciary are three main pillars of a state. They are independent and separate bodies but are supposed to work in combination in order to construct a smooth road for a democratic government to achieve good results.Before the present time the judiciary was not an independent organ. It was under the control of dictators who used the organ to fulfil their own interests.

Musharraf`s regime was the worst example of the exploitation of the judiciary, wherein the Supreme Court through the PCO gave green signal to dictatorship.
However, the new democratic government restored the judiciary which has now become a powerful institution after the military. The term `restoration of the judiciary` is perceived differently by different people.

For some, the restoration of the CJ is the restoration of the judiciary, whereas others believe that freedom of courts, law and order and neutrality in justice are the real elements in the restoration of the judiciary.
People are confused about who restored the judiciary. Some of the political parties claim the honour of restoring the judiciary through a mass mobilisation.
Perhaps they have forgotten the fact that once it was they who had attacked the judiciary. In fact, the credit for restoring the judiciary goes to the democratic government.

Today a cold war is seen going on between the judiciary and the government. In fact, it would be right to say this war is between the judiciary and the PPP. The war is about power and superiority.
The judiciary believes that it is the most powerful institution of the state, though in a democracy it is parliament which is the most powerful and superior organ of a democratic government.

Parliament is a law-making body and has the authority to make amendments to the constitution. As against this, the judiciary does not enjoy the popular mandate, and has no authority to amend the constitution. However, law experts and courts may suggest to parliament the need to amend or reform laws.
Criticising a democratic government is easier but it`s also time to recognise its successes and achievements such as Sawat operation, resettlement of Sawati people, NFC Award, giving identification to Pakhtuns, etc.

Benazir Bhutto used to say “A worst democracy is better than the best dictatorship.” During Musharraf` rule, she was the first person who stood up for judicial restoration, and her dream came true when the PPP government restored the judiciary.
Now that the judiciary is restored, it should stand for neutrality and impartiality.

SHAFIQ SOLANGI
Islamabad

http://archives.dawn.com/archives/51082


Monday, 18 June 2012


VIEW : Social media: a new paradigm in Pakistani politics —
 Shafiq Solangi
Daily Times: Saturday, June 16, 2012

Social networks are the best medium for our political parties to attract and engage their followers and voters

Gone are the days when we used to wait for a morning paper to know about national and international affairs; because of social media, we get the information as it happens. Today, in this advanced world of information technology, we are interconnected with the world around. Text messages, e-mails, facebook, twitter, blog spheres and other social media tools have replaced traditional media, like radio, print and television.

The internet has been perhaps the most outstanding innovation in the field of communication and research; today, a big chunk of the world’s population uses the internet for multi purposes. Internet World Stats (IWS) estimated that there are around 2,267,233,742 internet users in the world, which is 32.7 percent of the total world population. While a regional breakup suggests that 44.8 percent of total internet users are Asian, interestingly, among the world’s top 20 internet user states, China stands at number one, India at third and Pakistan at 20th.

According to the study, in December 2011, Pakistan’s total population was approximately 180 million out of which around 30 million used internet, which accounts for 15.5 percent of the total population of Pakistan. Facebook is the most visited internet site in Pakistan, followed by Google, YouTube, Blogs, Wikipedia, Twitter, LinkedIn and others. Pakistan is at 26th in world Facebook users rankings. Currently there are more than six million facebook users in Pakistan. About 51 percent of the six million facebook users from Pakistan belong to the 18-24 age group. Twitter is said to have more than three million users in Pakistan (more than the population of our capital city, Islamabad) and this rate is increasing rapidly. The 140 characters of a Twitter post are powerful beyond its size.

Internet penetration is dramatically increasing in our country as Pakistan Telecommunication Ltd (PTCL) and other telecommunication servers are now offering affordable and speedy internet services. Our involvement and interest in social networking can be judged when the government, particularly Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), was vastly criticised by every field of life in Pakistan when it blocked Twitter for more than eight hours on May 20. Next day, it was a front-page story in mainstream papers with editorials and opinion pieces.

Now the question that arises is what social media does and how it is effective. This new media is effective in many ways; firstly, it provides a platform to people where they can write, share and express their ideas without any fear or compulsion. Secondly, it provides an opportunity to get together and unite for a purpose or a cause. Thirdly, this media gives people an amazing power; to be sociable feels powerful on social media. Fourthly, it is an excellent source of connectivity; one can stay connected with family, friends and the world easily. Just get an internet connection and you are connected with the world. Fifthly, social media is a great forum where one can raise social, political or any other issues and make people and the concerned authorities hear. Sixthly, it informs you well; social media is a sea of information and one can keep one’s self well informed and well educated via these forums. Lastly, it generates and shapes an opinion or policy, the Arab Spring, UK riots and other such events are good examples of this.

It is well known that American candidates use social media to run their election campaigns. Nicolas Sarkozy and François Hollande too used social media very effectively in the French presidential elections held in April-May this year. Surprisingly, it played a very important role in helping Hollande to win the presidential election.

Today, political parties in Pakistan are also making good use of social media; most of the political parties have official web, facebook and Twitter pages. This shows that they have now recognised the power and significance of this new media. Social networks are the best medium for our political parties to attract and engage their followers and voters. Political parties including the PPP, PTI, PML-N, MQM and others operate their official Twitter, facebook and other social networks to communicate, engage and inform people about their events and policies.

Politicians too have their individual accounts. Imran Khan, Marvi Memon, Bilawal Bhutto, Shahbaz Sharif, Pervez Musharraf and others have big fan followings on social forums. This shows their interest to defend their parties and engage with people via social media. However; Imran Khan and his Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (PTI) is using social media more effectively and strategically than others. Diplomatic channels and diplomats are not behind in this race; they are actively engaged with their fan followers on social media forums. Some amongst those are Pakistan’s Ambassador to the US Sherry Rehman and the former ambassador Hussain Haqqani.

It will be not wrong to claim that these forums are playing a very effective and constructive role in our society and in the politics of the country. According to reports, 50 percent of the registered voters are between 18 to 35 years of age; political parties cannot ignore the fact that this segment of the population uses the internet and social networks the most. The one who will attract and engage the followers on social forums will definitely profit in the near future.

Social media is challenging the traditional political patterns and it is introducing new political paradigms. Our political parties have to own and adopt these new practices because social networks will definitely make some difference in future elections, and those who will ignore them may lose.

The writer is a political research analyst in Islamabad and tweets at @shafiqsolangi. He can be reached at Shafiqsolangi_ir@hotmail.com